THE ENERGY ENHANCEMENT MEDITATION COURSE BY VIDEO
VIGYAN BHAIRAV TANTRA VOL2
All and nothing mean the same

	
	 
VIGYAN BHAIRAV TANTRA VOL2
All and nothing mean the same
	YOU SAID THAT REALLY THERE IS NO ONE INSIDE US, THERE IS ONLY A VOID, AN 
	EMPTINESS, BUT THEN WHY DO YOU OFTEN CALL IT THE BEING, THE CENTER? 
	
	  
	Being or non-being, nothing or all -- they look contradictory but they both 
	mean the same. All and nothing mean the same. In dictionaries they are 
	opposites but in life they are not.Nobody understands. Look at it in this 
	way: if I say that I love all, or if I say that I love no one, it means the 
	same. If I love someone, then only is there a difference. If I love all, it 
	means the same as loving no one. There is no difference then. The difference 
	is always in degrees, relative. And these are both two extremes, they have 
	no degrees: the total and the zero have no degrees. So you can call the 
	total a zero, or you can call a zero the total. That's why some enlightened 
	persons have called the inner space emptiness, SUNYA, the void, nothingness, 
	non-being, ANATMA -- and some have called it the inner being, the absolute 
	being, the BRAHMA, ATMA, the supreme self. These are the two ways to 
	describe it. One is positive, the other is negative. Either you have to 
	include all or  have to exclude all -- you cannot describe it with any term 
	which is relative. An absolute term is needed. Both the contradictory poles 
	are absolute terms. 
	
	 But there have been some enlightened persons who have remained totally 
	silent. They have not called it anything, because whatsoever you call it -- 
	whether you call it being or non-being -- the moment you give it a name, a 
	term, a word, you have erred, because it includes both. 
	
	 For example, if you say, "God is alive," or "God is life," it is 
	meaningless, because then who will be death? He includes all. He must have 
	death in him as completely as life, otherwise to whom will death belong? And 
	if death belongs to someone else and life belongs to God -- then there are 
	two Gods, and then there will be many problems which cannot be solved. God 
	must be both life and death. God must be both the creator and the destroyer. 
	If you say God is the creator, then who is the destroyer? If you say God is 
	good, then who will be evil? Because of this difficulty, Christians, 
	Zoroastrians, and many other religions have created a Devil side by side 
	with God, because to whom will the evil belong? They have created a Devil. 
	But nothing is solved -- the problem is only pushed one step back because 
	then it can be relevantly asked, "Who has created the Devil?" If God himself 
	creates the Devil, then he is responsible. And if the Devil is something 
	independent, not related to God, then he himself becomes a God, a supreme 
	power. And if God has not created the Devil, how can God destroy him? It is 
	impossible. Theologians go on giving some answers to a question but that 
	answer again creates more questions. 
	
	 God created Adam, then Adam became evil. He was expelled. He disobeyed God 
	and he was expelled from the heavenly world. It has been asked again and 
	again, and relevantly, why did Adam become evil? The possibility must have 
	been created by God in him -- the possibility to be evil, to go wrong, to 
	disobey. If there was no possibility, no inherent tendency, then how could 
	Adam go wrong? God must have created the tendency. And if the tendency for 
	evil was there, another thing is also certain: the tendency to overcome it 
	was not so strong. the tendency to fight it was not so strong. The evil 
	tendency was stronger. Who created this strength? No one except God can be 
	responsible. Then the whole thing seems to be a hoax. God creates Adam: he 
	creates an evil tendency in him, a strong evil tendency which he cannot 
	control; then he goes wrong; then he is punished. God should be punished, 
	not Adam! Or, you have to accept that some other force exists side by side 
	with God. And that other force must be stronger than God, because the evil 
	can tempt Adam and God cannot protect him. The Devil can provoke and seduce 
	and God cannot protect. The Devil seems to be a stronger God. 
	
	 There is a church, recently born in America, called the church of Satan, 
	the church of the Devil. They have a high priest, just like the pope of the 
	Vatican. And they say that history proves that the real God is the Devil. 
	And they look logical. They say, "Your God, the God of good, has always been 
	defeated, and the Devil has always been the victorious. The whole of history 
	proves it. So why worship a weak God who cannot protect you? It is better to 
	follow a strong God who can seduce you but who can protect you also -- 
	because he is stronger." The church of the Devil is now a growing church. 
	And they seem logical. This is what history proves. 
	
	 This duality -- to save God from the negative pole -- creates problems. In 
	India we have not created the other pole. We say God is both: the creator 
	and the destroyer, the good and the bad. This is difficult to conceive of 
	because the moment we say "God" we cannot conceive of him being bad. But in 
	India we have tried to penetrate the deepest mystery of existence -- that 
	is, oneness. Somehow, good and bad, life and death, negative and positive, 
	meet somewhere, and that meeting point is existence, oneness. What will you 
	call that meeting point? Either you will have to use a positive term, or a 
	negative one, because we don't have any other terms. If you use positive 
	terms, then you call it "Being" with a capital B -- God, Absolute, BRAHMA. 
	Or if you want to use s negative term, then you call it nirvana, 
	nothingness, SUNYA, non-being, ANATMA. Both indicate the same. It is both 
	and your inner being is also both. That is why sometimes I call it being, 
	and sometimes I call it non-being. It is both. It depends on you. If the 
	positive appeals to you, then call it being. If the negative appeals to you, 
	then call it non-being. It depends on you. Whatsoever feels good, whatsoever 
	you feel will give you maturity, growth, evolution, call it that. 
 
	
	 There are two types of persons: one who cannot feel any affinity with 
	negativity and the other who cannot feel any affinity with the positive. 
	Buddha is the negative type. He cannot feel affinity with the positive, he 
	feels affinity with the negative. He uses all negative terms. Shankara 
	doesn't feel affinity with the negative. He talks about the ultimate reality 
	in positive terms. Both say the same thing. Buddha calls it SUNYA, and 
	Shankara calls it BRAHMA. Buddha calls it the void, nothing, and Shankara 
	calls it the Absolute, the All. But they are saying exactly the same thing.
	
	
	 Ramanuja, one of Shankara's greatest critics, says that Shankara is just a 
	hidden Buddhist. He is not a Hindu, he only appears to be because he uses 
	positive terms. That is all the difference there is. Wherever Buddha says 
	nothing, he says BRAHMA -- all else is the same. Ramanuja says that Shankara 
	is the great destroyer of Hinduism because he has brought Buddhism in from 
	the back door by just using a trick -- wherever a negative term is used, he 
	uses a positive term, that's all. He calls him a "PRACHANNA-BOUDDHA", a 
	crypto-Buddhist. And he is right in a way because there is no difference. 
	The message is the same. 
	
	 So it depends on you. If you feel an affinity with silence, nothingness, 
	then call that great being Emptiness. If you don't feel an affinity, if you 
	feel afraid, then call that emptiness The Great Being. But then your 
	techniques will be different. If you feel scared with emptiness, aloneness, 
	nothingness, then the four techniques I talked about last night will not be 
	of much use to you. Forget them. There are other methods about which I have 
	been talking. Use positive techniques. 
	
	 But if you are ready and have the courage to be supportless, to move into 
	emptiness, alone, ready to cease completely, then these four techniques will 
	help you tremendously. It depends on you. 
	
	  
	
	 The second question: 
	
	 Question 2 
	
	 IF THERE IS ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS INSIDE AN ENLIGHTENED ONE, THEN HOW IS IT 
	THAT HE SEEMS TO BE MAKING DECISIONS, DISCRIMINATING, LIKING THIS OR 
	DISLIKING THAT, SAYING YES OR NO? 
	
	  
	
	 This will really look a paradox. If an enlightened one is simply emptiness, 
	then for us it becomes a paradox. Then why does he say yes or no? Why does 
	ht choose? Why does he like some things and dislike other things? Why does 
	he talk? Why does he walk? Why does he live at all? 
	
	 For us this is a problem; but for the enlightened one it is not a problem. 
	Everything is done out of emptiness. The enlightened one is not choosing. It 
	looks like choice to us but the enlightened one simply moves in one 
	direction -- that direction comes from the emptiness itself. 
	
	 It is just like this. You are walking. Suddenly a car comes in front of you 
	and you feel that an accident will happen. You don't decide what to do. Do 
	you decide? How can you decide? There is no time. A decision will take time. 
	You will have to ponder and think, weigh up the pros and cons, decide 
	whether to jump this way or that. You don't decide. You simply jump. From 
	where does that jump com? Between the jump and you there is no thinking 
	process. Suddenly you become aware that the car is in front of you and you 
	jump. The jump happens first. Then later on you can think. In that moment 
	you jump through hastiness; your whole being jumps without any decision. 
	
	 Remember, decision is always of the part, it can never be of the whole. 
	Decision means that there was a conflict. One part of your being was saying, 
	"Do this," another part was saying, "Don't do this." That's why the decision 
	was needed. You had to decide, argue, and one part had to be pushed aside. 
	That's what decision means. When your totality is there, there is no need to 
	decide. There is no alternative. An enlightened one is total within himself, 
	total emptiness. So whatsoever comes out, it comes out of his totality, not 
	out of any decision. If he says "yes" it is not a choice: there was no "no" 
	to be chosen, there was no alternative. "Yes" is the response of his total 
	being. If he says "no", then "no" is the response of his total being. That's 
	why an enlightened man can never repent. You will repent always. Whatsoever 
	you do, it makes no difference -- whatsoever you do, you will repent. If you 
	want to marry a woman, if you decide "yes", you will repent, if you decide 
	"no", you will repent. Because whatsoever you decide is a partial decision, 
	the other part is always against. If you decide, "Yes, I will marry this 
	woman," one part of your being is saying, "Don't do this, you will repent." 
	You are not total. 
	
	 When difficulties arise.... They are bound to arise because when two 
	different persons start living together, difficulties are bound to arise. 
	There will be conflicts, there will be a struggle to dominate, there will be 
	power politics. Then the other part will say, "Look! What did I say? I was 
	insisting that you shouldn't do this, and you have done it." But that 
	doesn't mean that if you had followed the other part, there would have been 
	no repentance. No! The repentance would have been there, because then you 
	would have married some other woman, and the conflict and the struggle would 
	have happened. Then the other part would go on saying, "I was saying marry 
	the first woman. You have missed an opportunity. A heaven is lost, and you 
	are married to a hell." 
	
	 You will repent, whatsoever the case, because your decision cannot be 
	total. It is always against a part, and that part will take revenge. So 
	whatsoever you decide, if you do good you will repent, if you do bad you 
	will repent. If you do good, then your mind, the other part, will go on 
	saying that you have missed an opportunity. If you do bad, then you will 
	feel guilty. An enlightened being never repents. Really he never looks 
	backwards. There is nothing to look backwards at. Whatsoever is done is done 
	with his totality. 
	
	 So the first thing to be understood is that he never chooses. The choice 
	happens to his emptiness; he never decides. That doesn't mean that he is 
	indecisive. He is absolutely decisive, but he never decides. Try to 
	understand me. The decision happens in his emptiness. This is how his whole 
	being acts: there is nothing more to it. If you are walking and a snake 
	crosses your path, you jump suddenly -- that's all. You don't decide. You 
	don't consult a master and a guide. You don't go to look into books in the 
	library about what to do when a snake crosses the path -- how to do it, what 
	the technique is. You simply jump. And remember, that jump is coming from 
	your total being, it has not been a decision. Your total being has acted 
	that way. That is all. There is nothing more to it. To you it seems as if an 
	enlightened one is choosing, deciding, discriminating, because you are doing 
	that every moment. And you cannot understand something which you have not 
	known at all. An enlightened one happens to be doing things without any 
	decision, without any effort, without any choice -- he is choiceless. But 
	that doesn't mean that if you give him food and stones, he will start eating 
	stones. He will eat the food. To you it will look as if he has decided not 
	to eat the stones, but he has not decided. That is simply foolish. It 
	doesn't occur to him. He eats the food. This is not a decision -- only an 
	idiot person would decide whether to eat stones or food. Stupid minds 
	decide; enlightened minds simply act. And the more mediocre the mind, the 
	more effort has to be made for a decision. 
	
	 That's what worry means. What is worry? There are two alternatives and no 
	way to decide between them -- and the mind goes on, one moment this side, 
	another moment that side. This is what worry is. Worry means you have to 
	decide and you are trying to decide, but you cannot decide. So you are 
	worrying, puzzled, moving in vicious circles. An enlightened one is never 
	worried. He is total. Try to understand this. He is not divided, he is not 
	split, there are not two beings in him. But in you there is a crowd: not 
	only two, there are many, many persons living in you, many voices, just a 
	crowd. An enlightened one is a deep unity, he is a universe. You are a "multiverse". 
	This word "universe" is beautiful. It means one -- "uni". You are a "multiverse", 
	there are many worlds in you. 
	
	 The second thing to be understood is that whatsoever you do, before doing 
	it, there is thinking, thought. Whatsoever an enlightened person is doing, 
	there is no thinking, no thought. He is doing it. 
	
	 Remember, thinking is needed because you have no eyes to see. Thinking is a 
	substitute. It is just like a blind man groping his way on a path with a 
	stick. A blind man can ask people who have eyes how they grope, what type of 
	sticks they use to grope their way on the path. And they will simply laugh; 
	they will say that they don't need sticks. They have eyes. They simply see 
	where the door is, they need not grope for it. And they never think about 
	where the door is. They see and they pass through it. But a blind man cannot 
	believe that you can simply pass through a door. First you will have to 
	think about where the door is. First you will have to inquire. If someone is 
	there you will have to ask where the door is. And even if the direction is 
	given, you will have to grope for it with your stick -- and then too there 
	may be many pitfalls. But when you have eyes, if you want to go out, you 
	simply look... you don't think about where the door is, you don't decide. 
	You simply look, the door is there, you pass through it. You never think 
	that this is a door -- you simply use it and you act. 
	
	 The same is the situation with unenlightened minds and enlightened minds. 
	An enlightened mind simply looks. Everything is clear. He has a clarity. His 
	whole being is light. He looks around and he simply moves, acts -- he never 
	thinks. You have to think because you don't have eyes. Only blind men think; 
	they have to think because they don't have eyes. They need substitute eyes, 
	and thinking provides that. 
	
	 I never say that Buddha or Mahavira or Jesus are great thinkers. That would 
	be just nonsense. They are not thinkers at all. They are knowers, not 
	thinkers. They have eyes, they can see, and through their seeing they act. 
	Whatsoever comes out of a Buddha comes out of emptiness, not out of a mind 
	filled with thoughts. It has come out of an empty sky. It is the response of 
	emptiness. 
	
	 But for us it is difficult because nothing comes to us in that way. We have 
	to think about it. If someone asks a question, you have to think about it. 
	And even then you can never be certain that whatsoever you are saying is the 
	answer. A Buddha answers; he doesn't think. You question him, and the 
	emptiness simply responds. That response is not a thought-over thing. It is 
	a total response. His being behaves that way. That's why you cannot ask for 
	consistency from a Buddha. You cannot. Thought can be consistent, a thinker 
	is bound to be consistent -- but an enlightened person cannot be consistent, 
	because each moment the situation changes. And each moment things come out 
	of his emptiness. He cannot force. He cannot think. He does not really 
	remember what he said yesterday. Every question creates a new answer. And 
	every question creates a new response. It depends on the questioner. 
	
	 Buddha enters a village. One man asks, "Is there God?" Buddha says, "No." 
	In the afternoon, another man asks, "Is there God?" Buddha says, "Yes." Then 
	in the evening, a third one asks, "Is there God?" Buddha remains silent. In 
	just one day: in the morning, no; in the afternoon, yes; in the evening, 
	silence -- neither yes nor no. 
	
	 Buddha's disciple, Anand, became puzzled. He had heard all three answers. 
	In the night when everyone had retired, he asked Buddha, "Can I ask you a 
	question? Just in one day you have answered one question in three ways, not 
	only differently, contradictorily. My mind is puzzled. I cannot sleep if you 
	don't answer. What do you mean? In the morning you say yes, in the afternoon 
	no, in the evening you remain silent. And the question was the same." Buddha 
	said, "But the questioners were different. And how can different questioners 
	ask the same question?" This is really beautiful, very deep. He said, "How 
	can different questioners ask the same question? A question comes out of a 
	being, it is a growth. If the being is different, how can the question be 
	the same? In the morning when I said yes, the man who was asking was an 
	atheist. He had come to get my confirmation that there is no God. And I 
	could not confirm his atheism, because he was suffering because of it. And 
	because I could not be a part in his suffering, and I wanted to help him, I 
	said, "Yes, God exists." That's how I tried to destroy his so-called 
	atheism. In the afternoon, when the other person was there, he was a theist 
	and he was suffering through his theism. I couldn't say yes to him because 
	that would have been a confirmation -- which he had come for. Then he would 
	go and say, `Yes, whatsoever I was saying is right. Even Buddha says so.' 
	And the man was wrong. I could not help a wrong man in his wrongness so I 
	had to say no to destroy whatsoever he is, to shatter his mind. And the man 
	who came in the evening was neither. He was a simple, innocent man and he 
	was not asking for any confirmation. He had no ideology; he was really a 
	religious person. So I had to be silent. I said to him, "Be silent about 
	this question. Don't think about it." If I had said yes, it would have been 
	wrong because he was not there to find a theology. If I had said no, it 
	would have been wrong, because he was not to be confirmed in any atheism. He 
	was not interested in thoughts, in ideas, in theories, doctrines, no; he was 
	a real religious man. How can I utter any word before him? I had to be 
	silent. He understood my silence. When he went away, his religiousness had 
	deepened." 
	
	 Buddha said, "Three persons cannot ask the same question. They can 
	formulate it in a similar way -- that is another thing. The questions were 
	all "Does God exist?" Their formulation was the same, but the being from 
	where the question was coming was totally different. They meant different 
	things by it; their values were different; their associations with words 
	were different." 
 
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT
THE CORE ENERGY TECHNIQUES !!
ENERGY
ENHANCEMENT,  !!! ULTIMATE !!!!!! ANCIENT !!! !!! EFFECTIVE !!!!!
SUCCESSFUL !!!
1. Get into Intense alignment with Your Own Kundalini Energy and Immediate
Access to the Meditative State.
2. Remove your Energy Blockages with The Circulation of the Energies, the
Kundalini Kriyas, Ancient Taoist Energy Circulations which have worked
effectively for 5000 years to help all towards ENLIGHTENMENT.
3. The Grounding of all your Negative Energies through Alchemical VITRIOL -
Become Incredibly POSITIVE and ENERGETIC!!
4. Alignment with Your Higher Self - INCREASE YOUR IQ, INCREASE YOUR LUCK,
ACCESS YOUR HIGHEST ENERGIES!! ACHIEVE WHAT YOU WERE PUT ON THIS PLANET TO DO.
5. Learn how to USE and Increase the LOVE of Your Heart Center to ZAP YOUR
NEGATIVE EMOTIONS AND DEVELOP PSYCHIC POWERS TO HEAL YOURSELF AND OTHERS.
6. Overcome ENERGY VAMPIRES - MASTER ENERGY PROTECTION AND MAINTAIN YOUR HIGH
ENERGIES!!
7. EXPERIENCE INCREDIBLE RELATIONSHIPS WITH ENERGY ENHANCEMENT - THE CORE ENERGY
TECHNIQUES
8. ENERGY ENHANCEMENT Techniques are the source of all Successful spiritual
training courses over the last 5000 years. Become a Jedi Master, a Gandalf, a
Transmitter of the FORCE a Bringer of the Light!!
GET MORE ENERGY!!!
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT -
 !!! ULTIMATE !!!
!!! ANCIENT !!!
 !!! EFFECTIVE !!!
 !!! SUCCESSFUL !!!
Goto and SIGNUP NOW!!
https://www.energyenhancement.org/HomeStudyMeditationCourse.htm
| 
 CLICK BELOW TO GO TO 
 
 Take your time, this site has much new wonderful information.  | 
  |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
	
	 I remember, once it happened that Mulla Nasruddin came back to his house 
	one evening. The whole day he had been involved in a football match. He was 
	a fan. IN the evening when he entered the house, his wife was reading a 
	newspaper, and she said, "Look, Nasruddin, there is something for you. It is 
	reported here that a man has given his wife in return for a season ticket 
	for the football matches. You are also a fan, a mad fan, but I cannot 
	conceive that you would do the same. Or would you? Could you exchange me 
	just to get a season ticket for the football matches?" 
	
	 Nasruddin thought hard, and then he said, "Of course I would not -- because 
	it is ridiculous and criminal. The season is half over." 
	
	 Every mind has its own orientation. You may use the same words but because 
	you are different, those same words cannot be the same. 
	
	 Then Buddha said another thing, and that is even more significant. He said, 
	"Anand, why are you disturbed? You were not a party. You should not listen, 
	because not a single answer was given to you. You should remain indifferent, 
	otherwise you will go mad. Don't move with me because I will be involved 
	with many, many types of persons. And if you listen to everything that is 
	not said to you, you will get confused and crazy. You just leave me. 
	Otherwise remember to listen only when I speak to you; at other times don't 
	listen. Whatsoever I say is not your business. It was not said to you and it 
	was not your question at all. So why should you be worried? You were not 
	related. Someone asked, someone else replied. Why are you unnecessarily 
	worried about it? If you have the same question, ask, and then I will 
	answer. But remember, my answers are not to the questions, but to the 
	questioners. I respond. I look at the man, I see through the man, the man 
	becomes transparent -- and this is my response. The question is irrelevant; 
	the questioner is relevant." 
	
	 You cannot ask for consistency from an enlightened person. Only 
	unenlightened, ignorant persons can be consistent, because they don't have 
	to look. They just follow some ideas. They carry dead ideas, consistently. 
	For their whole life they will carry something and they will remain 
	consistent to it. They are stupid, that's why they can remain consistent. 
	They are not alive. They are dead. Aliveness cannot be consistent. That 
	doesn't mean that it is wrong -- aliveness is consistent, but very deeply, 
	not on the surface. Buddha is consistent in all the three answers, but his 
	consistency is not in the answers -- his consistency is in his effort to 
	help. He wanted to help the first man. He wanted to help the second man. He 
	wanted to help the third man. For all three, compassion was there, love was 
	there. He wanted to help them -- that is his consistency. But it is a deep 
	current. His words are different, his answers are different, but his 
	compassion is the same. 
	
	 So when an enlightened person speaks, answers, that answer is a total 
	response of his emptiness, of his being. He echoes you, he reflected you, he 
	is a mirror. He has no face of his own. Your face is mirrored in his heart. 
	So if an idiot comes to meet a Buddha, he will meet an idiot -- Buddha is 
	just a mirror. And that man will go and spread the rumor that Buddha is an 
	idiot. He has seen himself in Buddha. If someone sensitive, understanding, 
	mature, grown up comes, he will see something else in Buddha: he will see 
	his own face. There is no other way -- you go on seeing mirrors in persons 
	who are totally empty. Then whatsoever you carry is your interpretation. 
	
	 It is said in old scriptures that when you reach an enlightened person, 
	remain totally silent. Don't think, otherwise you will miss the opportunity 
	of meeting him. Just remain silent. Don't think. Absorb him, but don't try 
	to understand him through your head. Absorb him, drink him, allow your total 
	being to be open to him, let him move within you, but don't think about him 
	-- because if you think, then your mind will be echoed. Let your total being 
	be bathed in his presence. Only then will you have a glimpse of what type of 
	being, of what type of phenomenon you have come in contact with. Many came 
	to Buddha. They came and went. They carried their own opinions, and they 
	went out and they spread them. Very few, really very few, understood -- and 
	that is how it should be, because you can understand only according to you. 
	If you are ready to melt and change and be transformed, only then can you 
	understand what an enlightened person, what an enlightened being is. 
	
	  
	
	 The third question: 
	
	 Question 3 
	
	 YOU SAID THAT NOISE AND DISTURBANCES ARE NOT OUTSIDE IN THE WORLD, BUT ARE 
	BECAUSE OF YOUR OWN MINDS AND EGO. BUT WHY DO THE SAINTS AND MYSTICS ALWAYS 
	LIVE IN UNNOISY, UNCROWDED PLACES? 
	
	  
	
	 Because they are still not saints and mystics. They are still endeavoring, 
	still working. They are seekers, not SIDDHAS. They have not reached. Noise 
	will disturb them, the crowd will disturb them. The crowd will pull them 
	back to its own level. They are still weak, they need protection. They are 
	still not confident. They cannot move into temptation. They have to protect 
	themselves in the lonely solitude where they can grow and become strong. 
	When they are strong there will be no problem. Mahavir moved into the 
	wilderness. For twelve years he was alone, silent, not talking, not moving 
	in villages or cities. Then he became enlightened. Then he came back to the 
	world. Buddha was in total silence for six years. Then he came back to the 
	world. Jesus or Mohammed, or anyone -- when they are growing they need 
	protected conditions. When they have grown, then there is no problem. 
	
	 So if you find a mystic afraid of moving in a crowd, then know well that he 
	is still a child, growing. Otherwise why should a mystic be afraid of moving 
	in crowds? Nothing can be done to him by the crowd, by the noise, by the 
	world, by the objects of the world. With all this madness around him, 
	nothing can be done to him. He cannot be touched. He can move and he can 
	live -- anywhere it happens for his emptiness to live, he can live. 
	
	 But in the beginning it is good to be alone, to be in a harmonious, natural 
	surrounding. So remember, don't think that because you live in a noisy 
	Bombay you are a mystic, or you have grown up and have become a SIDDHA. If 
	you want to grow you will also have to move sometimes, for some definite 
	periods, into loneliness -- out of the crowd, out of the concerns of the 
	world, relations of the world, objects of the world -- into such a place 
	where you can be alone and not disturbed by others. As you are now you can 
	be disturbed, but once you have the strength, once you have the inner power, 
	once you are crystallized and you know that now no one can shatter your 
	inner center, you can move anywhere. Then the whole world is lonely. Then 
	wherever you are is wilderness. Then the space of silence moves with you 
	because you are the creator of it. Then around you, you create your own 
	inner silence, and wherever you move, you are in silence. No one can 
	penetrate that silence. No noise can disturb it. 
	
	 But unless the crystallization has happened, don't believe that you will 
	not be disturbed. You are disturbed, whether you know it or don't know it. 
	Really, you are so disturbed that you cannot know it. You have become 
	accustomed to disturbance. Every nerve is on edge; you are continuously 
	disturbed. Right now you don't feel the disturbance -- to feel the 
	disturbance sometimes you need to be not disturbed. Only then can you feel 
	it in contrast. You are continuously disturbed but you have become 
	accustomed to it, habituated to it. You think this is how life is. It would 
	be good if you move into the Himalayas for some time. It would be good to go 
	into some remove village, a remote forest, and be alone for a few days' 
	silence -- as if the whole of humanity has disappeared. Then come back to 
	Bombay. Then you will know what disturbance you have been living in. You 
	will be suddenly disturbed. Now you have a contrast. You had an inner music, 
	now it is shattered. For seekers solitariness is good; for SIDDHAS it is 
	irrelevant. 
	
	 And there are two types of wrong people. With the first type, if you say to 
	them that it is they who are disturbed, the situation is irrelevant, then 
	they will never go into solitariness to have a glimpse of what silence is. 
	Then they will remain here and they will say, "Nothing disturbs us. It is us 
	really, not the surrounding. So we remain here." And they are disturbed but 
	their theory will become a rationalization. Then there are other people, the 
	other type of wrong people, who, if you tell them to move into silence, to 
	solitude, because it will help, they will move -- but then they will never 
	come back. Then it becomes an addiction and they will remain weak forever, 
	they will always feel afraid of coming back to the world. Then their 
	solitariness has not been a help; rather, it has become a hindrance. They 
	are not stronger through it, they have become weaker. Now they cannot move 
	in the world. Both these types are wrong. 
	
	 Be the third type, which is the right type. In the beginning, know well 
	that you are disturbed by circumstances; so sometimes try, manage, to move 
	out of them. Then when you are out of them, whatsoever silence you attain, 
	bring it back to your circumstances and try to preserve it. If you can 
	preserve it in the circumstances, then only will the theory have become an 
	experience. Then you know that nothing disturbs. Then you know it is you 
	ultimately who are disturbed or not disturbed. But make it an experience -- 
	just as a theory it is useless. 
	
	  
	
	 The fourth question: 
	
	 Question 4 
	
	 IT IS ONE THING TO REALIZE COSMIC CONSCIOUSNESS ON EARTH, AND TRANSCEND 
	BODY. BUT HOW DO REALIZED ONES KNOW FOR SURE THAT THIS CONSCIOUSNESS IS 
	ETERNAL AND WILL REMAIN AFTER THE DEATH OF THE BODY? 
	
	  
	
	 The first thing is they don't bother about it. They are not worried about 
	whether it will remain or not. It is you who are worried. They don't think 
	of the next moment. The next life is just irrelevant; even the next day, the 
	next moment, is not a point of concern. It is you who always ask about 
	something in the future, something of the future. Why? Because your present 
	is just empty, your present is just nothing, your present is just rotten, 
	your present is such a suffering that you can tolerate it only if you go on 
	thinking of the future and the paradise and the life ahead. Just here now 
	there is no life so you pitch your mind into the future just to escape from 
	the present, the ugly present. One who is realized is here and now, totally 
	alive. All that can happen has happened. There is no future to it. Whether 
	death is going to kill him or not is not a concern at all. It is the same. 
	Whether he disappears or remains, it makes no difference. This moment is so 
	rich, so absolutely rich, this moment is so intense, that his whole being is 
	here and now. 
	
	 Anand asked Buddha again and again, "What will happen to you when your body 
	dies?" And Buddha insisted again and again, "Anand, why are you so concerned 
	about the future? Why don't you look at me, at what is happening now?" But 
	again, after a few days, he will ask, "What happens to an enlightened one 
	when his body dies?" He is afraid about himself. He is afraid. He knows that 
	when the body dies there is no possibility of reviving it, there is no 
	possibility of remaining, there is no possibility of being. And he has not 
	attained anything. The light will just go out -- it has been a futile thing. 
	If that happens without his attaining anything, he will simply disappear. So 
	the whole thing was meaningless, the whole suffering was meaningless, 
	leading nowhere. He was concerned; he wanted to know if something survives 
	after the body. But Buddha says, "I am here and now. What will happen in the 
	future is not a concern at all." 
	
	 So the first thing is that a realized one is not bothered. That is one of 
	the signs of a realized one -- he is not bothered by the future. 
	
	 And the second thing -- you asked, how does he know for sure? Knowledge is 
	always sure. Certainty is inherent, intrinsic, to knowledge. You have a 
	headache. Can I ask you, "How can you say for sure that you have a 
	headache?" You will say, "I know." I can ask, "But how are you sure that 
	your knowledge is right and not wrong?" But no one asks such nonsensical 
	questions. When the headache is there, it is there -- you know it. Knowledge 
	is intrinsically certain. When one is enlightened, he knows he is 
	enlightened; he knows that he is not this body; he knows that inside he is 
	just a vast space. And space cannot die. Things can die, space cannot die.
	
	
	 Just think about this room. We can destroy this building, this "Woodlands", 
	but we cannot destroy the roominess in this room. Can you destroy it? The 
	walls can be destroyed, but we are sitting here in this roominess, space. 
	The walls can be destroyed, but how can you destroy this room -- not the 
	walls, the space here? The whole of "Woodlands" may disappear -- it will 
	disappear one day -- but this space will remain. Your body will disappear 
	and because you don't know the inner space, you are afraid. You want to know 
	it for sure. But an enlightened man knows that he is the space -- not the 
	body, not the walls, but the inner space. The walls will drop, they have 
	dropped many times, but the inner space will remain. It is something he has 
	to find proofs for, it is his immediate knowledge. He knows it, that's all. 
	Knowledge is intrinsically certain. 
	
	 If your knowledge is uncertain, then remember it is not knowledge. People 
	come to me and they say, "Our meditation is going very well. We are feeling 
	very happy." And then suddenly they ask me, "What do you say about it? Is 
	our happiness really there? Are we really happy?" They ask me! They are not 
	certain about their happiness. What type of knowledge is this? They are 
	simply pretending. But they cannot deceive themselves. They are thinking, 
	they are hoping, they are wishing -- but they are not happy. Otherwise what 
	is the need to ask me? I will never go to ask anybody whether I am happy or 
	not. Why should I? If I am happy, I am happy. If I am not, I am not. Who 
	else can give proof of it? If I cannot be a witness, who will be a witness 
	for me, and how can the other be a witness? So sometimes I play games. 
	Sometimes I say, "Yes, you are happy. You are absolutely happy." And they 
	become more happy just by hearing me. And sometimes I say, "No, you don't 
	show anything. There is no indication. You are not happy. You must have been 
	dreaming." And they drop, their happiness disappears, they become sad. What 
	type of happiness is this? Just by saying that you are happy it increases; 
	and just by saying that you are not, it disappears! They are just trying to 
	be happy but they are not. This is not knowledge, this is just 
	wish-fulfillment. They hope, and they think they can deceive themselves. By 
	thinking that they are happy, believing that they are happy, finding some 
	proof, finding some certificate from somewhere that they are happy, they 
	think that they will create happiness. It is not so easy. When something 
	happens in the inner world, you know it has happened. You don't need any 
	certificate, you don't need one! The very search for someone to approve is 
	childish. It shows that you long for happiness, but you have not attained 
	it. You don't know it. It has not happened to you. 
	
	 One who has realized is always certain, and when I say certain, sure, 
	absolutely sure, I don't mean that he feels some uncertainty somewhere, and 
	against that uncertainty he feels certain -- no. He is simply certain. There 
	is no question of uncertainty. I am alive. Am I certain about it, sure about 
	it? There is no question. There is no question of certainty. It is 
	absolutely certain. It does not have to be decided. I am alive. 
	
	 Socrates was dying and someone asked him, "Socrates, you are dying so 
	easily, so happily. What is the matter? Are you not afraid? Are you not 
	scared?" Socrates said a very beautiful thing. He said, "Only two things are 
	possible after I am dead: either I will be or I will not be. If I am not, 
	then there is no question. No one is there to know it, to know that `I am 
	not'. The whole thing simply disappears. And if I am there, then there is no 
	question -- `I am'. Only two are the possibilities: either I will be, or I 
	will not be, and both are okay. If I am, then the whole thing continues. If 
	I am not, then there is no one to know, so why be worried?" 
	
	 He is not an enlightened one, but he is a very wise man. Remember, this is 
	the difference between a wise one and an enlightened one. A wise one thinks 
	deeply, penetrates intellectually into everything, and comes to a 
	conclusion. He is a very wise man. He says that there are two alternatives. 
	Logically he penetrates into the phenomenon of death: "only two are the 
	possibilities: either I simply disappear, I am no more; or I will remain." 
	Is there any third alternative? There is no third alternative. So Socrates 
	says, "I have thought about both. If I remain, then there is no question to 
	be worried about. If I am no more, there is no one to worry. So why be 
	worried now? I will see what happens." He is not in the know, he doesn't 
	know what is going to happen, but he has thought about it wisely. He is not 
	a Buddha, he is the keenest intellectual possible. But if you can become 
	wise -- not enlightened, because enlightenment is neither wisdom nor 
	ignorance, the duality has been transcended -- even if you can become wise, 
	you will feel relaxed; even if you can become wise, you can feel very 
	contented. 
	
	 But wisdom is not the goal of Tantra or yoga. Tantra and yoga aim for the 
	superhuman, the point where wisdom and ignorance are both transcended: where 
	one simply knows and does not think, where one simply looks and is aware.
	
	
	  
	
	 The last question: 
	
	 Question 5 
	
	 I CERTAINLY WANT TO BECOME ENLIGHTENED. BUT IF I DO, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES 
	IT MAKE FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD? 
	
	  
	
	 But why are you worried about the rest of the world? Let the world worry 
	about itself. And you are not worried about what will happen to the rest of 
	the world if you remain ignorant.... 
	
	 If you are ignorant, what happens to the rest of the world? You create 
	misery. Not that you knowingly do it, you are misery -- so whatsoever you 
	do, you sow seeds of misery all around. Your hopes are meaningless; your 
	being is significant. You may think you are helping others -- you hinder 
	them. You may think you love others -- you may be simply killing them and 
	murdering them. You may think you are teaching others, but you may be simply 
	helping them to remain ignorant forever -- because what you hope, what you 
	think, what you wish, is not significant. What you are is significant. 
	
	 Every day I see people around who are loving to each other -- but they are 
	killing each other. They think they are loving, and they think they are 
	living for the other, and without them the life of their family, their 
	beloveds, their children, their wives, their husbands, will be miserable -- 
	but it is miserable with them. And they try in every way but whatsoever they 
	do, it goes wrong. It is bound to be so, because they are wrong. Doing is 
	not of much importance, the being from where it comes, originates, is. If 
	you are ignorant, you are helping the world to become a hell. It is already. 
	This is what has happened through you. Wherever you touch, you will create 
	hell. 
	
	 If you become enlightened, whatsoever you do -- or you need not do anything 
	-- just your being, your presence will help others to flower, to be happy, 
	to be blissful. 
	
	 But that should not be your concern. The first thing is how to be 
	enlightened. You ask me, "I want to be enlightened." But that wanting seems 
	to be very impotent because immediately you say "but". Whenever "but" comes 
	in, it shows the desire is impotent. "But what will happen to the world?" 
	Who are you? What do you think about yourself? Does the world depend on you? 
	Are you running it? Managing it? Are you responsible? Why give so much 
	importance to yourself? Why feel so important? 
	
	 This feeling is part of the ego and this worrying about others will never 
	allow you to move to a peak of realization, because that peak is achieved 
	only when you drop all worries. And you are so efficient in accumulating 
	worries that you are simply wonderful. Not only your own, you go on 
	accumulating others' worries -- as if yours are not enough. You go on 
	thinking about others, and what can you do? You can only get more and more 
	worried and mad. 
	
	 I was reading a viceroy's journal. Lord Wavell's journal. The man seems to 
	be very sincere, deeply honest, because some remarks he makes are just 
	superb. One remark he makes in a journal is, "Unless these three old men, 
	Gandhi, Jinnah, and Churchill, die, India will be in trouble." These three 
	men, Gandhi,Jinnah, Churchill -- and these three were helping in every way! 
	Churchill's own viceroy writes in a journal that these three men should die 
	soon. And he hopefully even gives their ages: Gandhi, 75,Jinnah, 65, 
	Churchill, 68. Because these three are the problems. Can you think of Gandhi 
	imagining that he is the problem -- or Jinnah, or Churchill? All are doing 
	their best to solve the problem of this country! And Wavell said that these 
	three are the problem, because all the three are adamant, stubborn; every 
	one of these three has the absolute truth and the other two are absolutely 
	wrong. These three absolutes cannot meet anywhere -- the other two are 
	simply wrong. There is no question about it. 
	
	 Everyone thinks as if he is the center and he has to worry about the whole 
	world, and change the whole world, transform the whole world, create a 
	utopia. All that you can do is just change yourself. You cannot change the 
	world. You can create more mischief trying to change it; you can create more 
	chaos; you can harm; and you can puzzle. Already the world is too puzzled. 
	You can puzzle it more and confuse it more. 
	
	 Please leave the world to itself. You can do only one thing, and that is, 
	you can achieve inner silence, inner bliss, inner light. If you achieve 
	this, you have helped the world very much. Just by changing one ignorant 
	spot into an enlightened flame, just by changing one person from darkness 
	into light, you have changed apart of the world. And this changed part will 
	have its own chain reactions. Buddha is not dead. Jesus is not dead. They 
	cannot be dead because there is a chain reaction -- from one lamp, from one 
	flame, another flame takes over. And a successor is created, and they go on 
	living. 
	
	 But if your light is not there, if your lamp is without a flame, you cannot 
	help anyone. The first basic thing is that you must attain your inner flame. 
	Then others can share. Then you can kindle others' light also. Then it 
	becomes a succession. Then you may disappear from the body but your flame 
	goes on passing from hand to hand. Up to eternity it goes on and on. Buddhas 
	never die, enlightened persons never die, because their light becomes a 
	chain reaction. And unenlightened persons never live, because they cannot 
	create any chain, they don't have any light to share, no flame to kindle 
	someone else's flame. 
	
	 Please be concerned with yourself only. Be selfish, I say, because that is 
	the only way you will become selfless, that is the only way you can become a 
	help and a blessing to the world. Don't be worried about it; that is not 
	your concern. The greater your worries are, the greater you think your 
	responsibilities are. And the greater your responsibilities, the more you 
	feel yourself as being great. You are not. You are simply mad. Get out of 
	this madness of helping others. Just help yourself. That's all that can be 
	done. 
	
	 And then many things happen... but they happen as a consequence. Once you 
	become a source of light, things start happening. Many will share it, man 
	will be enlightened through it, many will attain life, more life, abundant 
	life through it. But don't think about it. You cannot do anything about it 
	consciously. Only one thing can be done and that is: you can become 
	conscious. 
	Then everything follows
	
 
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT
THE CORE ENERGY TECHNIQUES !!
| 
 CLICK BELOW TO GO TO 
 
 Take your time, this site has much new wonderful information.  | 
  |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 
| 
       	
       	
		
		ENERGY ENHANCEMENT OSHO MEDITATION ARTICLES INTRODUCTION TESTIMONIALS EE DIRECTORS EE FAQS EE LEVEL1 EE LEVEL2 EE LEVEL3 EE LEVEL4 EE DVD VIDEO COURSE EE ONLINE COURSE COURSE IN ARGENTINA COURSE IN SPAIN COURSE IN PERU + IGUAZU EE COURSES INDIA TOUR EE COURSES TAJ MAHAL EE YOGA TEACHER TRAINING TALKS BY SATCHIDANAND EE E BOOK EE REIKI EE TEACHER TRAINING  |