

Ben Fellows: 'Murdoch Newspaper Does a 'BBC'.
Ben Fellows was contacted by Ruth Lewy from The Times newspaper on 16 October 2012.

4. Ben refers to a party in a house in the New Forest attended by the founder of a child protection charity.
Full story here: Ben Fellows: 'Murdoch Newspaper Does a 'BBC'.
At 21st Century Wire we also read "Former Child Actor: ‘I named names, but they’ve buried my story’"
Clarke has been linked to Savile, as Savile was handed the keys to Broadmoor secure hospital in 1988 - under the watch of Minister Ken Clarke.
Sir Jimmy Savile is linked to the Kray Twins.

Comment from Moshe Solomons:
"My family knew the Krays through the Jewish underground.
"My family were influential.
"In fact my uncle was the first man to expose the Ann Frank fraud, because he felt it was an insult to Jewry.
"Rose Finesilver was a powerful voice in world Jewry who was the Krays early handlers.
"But the reason for the Krays downfall was they upset powerful figures in the Jewish community by claiming the Holocaust did not happen as claimed.
"Most of their money was earnt by prostitution protection rackets, fixing boxing matches and gambling clubs, not just from renting out boys to gays; this was just a small part of their operation."
(NB - some of the information we are being sent may of course be disinformation.)
DISCLAIMER: THE POSTING OF STORIES, COMMENTARIES, REPORTS, DOCUMENTS AND LINKS (EMBEDDED OR OTHERWISE) ON THIS SITE DOES NOT IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, IMPLIED OR OTHERWISE, NECESSARILY EXPRESS OR SUGGEST ENDORSEMENT OR SUPPORT OF ANY OF SUCH POSTED MATERIAL OR PARTS THEREIN

Esther Rantzen likes kids. Website for this image. She founded the children's charity Childline.
TAP - I decided to watch Esther Rantzen on 'Who do you think you are?'
This is what I saw.
Time to realise who Esther Rantzen is
"Her father was a BBC engineer...
"Jewish parents.
"Great grandfather a fraudster...
"Esther was pleased he got away with stealing all his clients' money, and shooting one of his father's servants.
"Esther found it all rather hilarious.
"Her father's father, the Rantzen side, was a wealthy stockbroker with sexual history, raping a parlourmaid.
"Again she finds this hilarious.

Esther Rantzen founded Childline in 1986. Childline is now part of the charity NSPCC. There is a suspicion that all the major children's charities have been infiltrated by the spooks.
"The Rantzens were early arrivals in the 1850s from Warsaw, moving up to upper middle class level by 1880...
"Her great grandfather Abraham became a diamond broker and made a fortune.
"Esther's father's middle name was Barnato, from Barnie Barnato, one of the richest men in the world, a diamond dealer.
"Her great grandmother, Sarah Isaacs, was the sister of Barnie Barnato.
"He bought the right plots in South Africa, and was bought out by Cecil Rhodes for £500,000,000, the biggest cheque ever written at the time.
"Barnato later disappeared off a ship without trace...
"Esther acts as if she never knew and wondered what happened to all the money..."
Much more here: Time to realise who Esther Rantzen is

"Also found in the murder house were a number of cameras and many films of naked children being sexually assaulted and, in one case, killed with a garotte."
"On March 27, 2008, two teams of agents from the Turkish Ministry of the Interior, acting on information received from a foreign intelligence agency, conducted a heavily armed raid on a house in Balikesir.

Website for this image

Kenneth A was actually Keith Leslie Urkhardt of 4400 East West Highway, Bethesda, Md. 20814
Myron G was actually Istvan Prouty of 3400 North Venice St., Arlington, VA 22207
Timothy MC was actually Thomas McAuliffe Porterman of 415 Russell Ave., Gaitherburg, MD 20877
Robert A was actually Russell Allan Gordon of 1595 North Atlantic Ave, Cocoa Beach, FL 32931
Jacob Z was actually George Berman of 10570 Main St., Fairfax, VA 22030
Arthur C was actually Ervin Melrose of 3014 Brinkley Rd., Temple Hills, MD 20748
DISCLAIMER: THE POSTING OF STORIES, COMMENTARIES, REPORTS, DOCUMENTS AND LINKS (EMBEDDED OR OTHERWISE) ON THIS SITE DOES NOT IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, IMPLIED OR OTHERWISE, NECESSARILY EXPRESS OR SUGGEST ENDORSEMENT OR SUPPORT OF ANY OF SUCH POSTED MATERIAL OR PARTS THEREIN
22 COMMENTS:
thankyou angirfan for this exposure, i had been folowing this for some time on the excellant peter eyre website, esther rancid
has long had a very bad name in the TV industry.
One major point is that the government is behind the push for homosexuality, and has surgically cut any mention of boys from the jimmy saville case and others.
its only because of the internet this came out at all
tete wilson
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2221130/Emails-plunge-BBC-worst-crisis-50-years-Newsnight-boss-steps-damning-evidence-Savile-cover-up.html
I kept tackling my brother in law who works at the BBC about Jimmy Savile, and he got angry and blurted out, " look we could not go into it, if we outed savile, the connections with the Krays, Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Bagan, Esther Rantxen Peter Mandelson and Rupert Murdoch will all come out, do you want that ?
the BBC is run by jews any investigtion could even expose the gigantic bollocaust fraud now leave me alone about it "
Harry Marsh
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100185799/how-hatties-friends-defended-paedophilia/
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/10/natoziocons-restarting-cedar-revolution-2483668.html
Boy George used to live in the in/famous Warren Street Squat.... Google it..
His school days.... Im sure smth happened to him then....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1260886/Me-school-photo-Boy-George-remembers-lots-shouting-canings.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9623089/Jimmy-Savile-Questions-for-Edwina-Currie-and-the-BBC.html
Be careful about writing to Cointelpro honeytraps, people.
Dear Cecil Hargreaves,
aangirfan: HITLER THE GAY JEW?
aangirfan: THE REAL HITLER
aangirfan: IT'S A GAY WORLD
The "elite" public boarding school I went to used to send boys on a sail-training ship. The teachers who were reputed to be paedophiles were all involved with it, and many public figures. All the same names cropped up at Haut de la Garenne, none (as far as I know) have been convicted.
I used to think that "humanist" and "paedophile" meant the same thing, because most child-centred "humanism" seems to be a smokescreen for abuse.
I'm not sure at all about this Ben Fellows...
I knew I'd heard the name before and then it came to me. He was a guest on Red Ice Radio pre Olympics doing an expose of G4S's lax security preparedness.
I remember thinking, "is that the best you've got after having been, quote, deep undercover for a year".. I just thought it was a pissweak interview.
Yet here he is with some of the most explosive information, at Savile's public outing, and he never thought to mention this before.
Right-O.
Not your traditional description of a secondary boarding school:
"Sevenoaks is home to loads of hunky gay lads plus lots of clubs and gay cruising. Sevenoaks is said to be a Kentish Commuter Town situated on the London fringe of west Kent, England, some 20 miles south-east of Charing Cross, on one of the principal commuter rail lines from the capital. Sevenoaks posesses a gay atmosphere with many gay bars and also gay clubs. There are a number of independent educational establishments in the town, including the prestigious Sevenoaks School. Men come to Sevenoaks for its very good gay environment and easy men. The town’s name is said to be derived from the Saxon word Seouenaca, the name given to a small chapel near seven oak trees in Knole Park around 800 AD. Check out the catalog of lads and gay bars in Sevenoaks…"
http://www.gay-cruise.net/gay-sevenoaks-bars-clubs-dating-cruising/
Patrick Henningsen, founder of the 21st century wire website which features Ben Fellows' claims, is a 'regular geopolitical analyst' for the Russian Times according to his Guardian profile.
I'm getting so f***** sick of this warped tribe and the way in which they have debased and corrupted all of our institutions.
Trouble is that most people are so thick and ill informed that they couldn't see the truth if it was hitting them over the head.
Saville - Jew
Currie - Jew
Krays - Jews
Rancid - Jew
BBC - fulls of Jews in strategic positions of control
Police - full of Freemason watercarriers
And of course if they do get a glimpse then they immediately recoil due the "Holocaust"™
Excellent article. Is it any wonder that the UK is so screwed when one considers that the self-Chosen enemies of humanity control the government, economy, media, police etc etc. The Expulsion Edict of 1290 needs to be enforced, and the whole parasitic tribe relocated to Birobidjan (not Palestine), where they can destroy each other and not bother the rest of us.
No worries, Murdoch's Sun just yesterday established a new mob of cyber-vigilantes, headed by two mums, to hunt down paedophiles. Provided, of course, they're pockmarked yobs, chavs and such. Lords and Ladies need not fear.
re - Anonymous 2:24 PM above
"I used to think that "humanist" and "paedophile" meant the same thing, because most child-centred "humanism" seems to be a smokescreen for abuse."
Like the animal activists who sacrifice a few kittens to fake animal snuff videos, then collect millions in donations to, "Help Us Catch the Monstrous Fiend." The Red Tops know how that works too.
Edo, I also found that blog post about Ben Fellows and was just about to repost it but you beat me to it.
I was shocked when I saw Ken Clarke being implicated. I don't want to hurt anyone who has been abused as a child by not believing them when they try to tell what happened to them, because I know how that feels, but this really shocked me and I cant help wondering is it true?
I know many in the Fathers Rights groups hate Ken Clarke because he tried to crack down on the secret family court corrupt lawyers gravy train, the secret family courts are using syndromes invented by paedophiles to make loads of money and screw peoples lives up.
Anonymous said "Murdoch's Sun just yesterday established a new mob of cyber-vigilantes, headed by two mums, to hunt down paedophiles. Provided, of course, they're pockmarked yobs, chavs and such. Lords and Ladies need not fear."
And the real problem is that ALL child protection is mob vigilantism, whether it is criminal records checks turning up stupid teenage acts, banning people from acting normally around Scouts, or dredging up every embarrassing fact in family court. None of it helps children be safe with adults, and none of it helps adults recognize abuse when it is happening. Abusers do not have horns.
The whole Jimmy Savile circus will now roll on in some grand moral panic, with links to satanism and necrophilia, at least some of which will turn out to be false. Then they can bury the whole affair as one deeply aberrant man who conned everyone, and bury his associations with other paedophiles underneath any false allegations.
Meanwhile about 20% of all children are sexually abused - that is 140,000 children abused every year in England and Wales.
Some time back a close freind who was a postman discovered loads of plain brown envelopes he was delivering contained awful child porn pics, he told his line manager who said you are not paid to think just deliver mail.
so he went and
complained to the childline and police giving a long list of adresses of people recieving this including 2 of his own managers social workers and a teacher, the police informed his manager he wss whistleblowing, his manager sacked him under pretences of something else, he went to the top of the mail system and they saud " the mail needs to make a profit and we turn no financial assets away " and the cover up continued
Daily Mail questions why police were soft on Savile:
Were the police in awe of Jimmy Savile?
One of the most disturbing aspects of the Jimmy Savile scandal – and there is strong competition for that dubious distinction – is why police didn’t arrest him over child abuse allegations five years ago.
Detectives spent months investigating claims the BBC star molested an under-age girl at a children’s home in the 1970s.
But for reasons which have not been fully explained, officers from Surrey Police decided not to detain him and instead interviewed him by appointment.
The importance of that decision in the wider scandal cannot be exaggerated because had police arrested Savile, they would have had the right to search his home.
I just wonder what they would have found at the home of a serial child sex predator who for decades clearly felt he was above the law. Child porn videos, pictures of under-age girls on computer equipment or even pictures of his young victims?
I suspect that had he been arrested, news of his detention would have leaked and dozens of his other victims would belatedly have felt strong enough to make further allegations of abuse against him. He would have faced justice.
As it was, the Crown Prosecution Service ruled there was insufficient evidence to charge him and it was only after his death that the truth came out.
http://wrightblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/10/jimmy-savile-scandal.html
This is a detailed description of The Cook Reports attempted entrapment of Greer, Grylls etc. it refers to the 'young Ben' masquerading as openly gay. http://www.guardianlies.com/section%202/gls2p07a.rtf
Time to realise who is Esther Rantzen
Remember the 2009 report on how the top elite at nspcc were creaming millions for themselves & shutting down help lines because they didn't have enough cash to run them?
COMMENT anonymous - If we accept that the Rothschild banking dynasty is at the top of the pyramid in this country and that Savile was a 'fixer' between politicians (TAP - and for royalty) and children from children's homes, and that he was passing on info to the Israelis about said politicians to be used by them as blackmail, we can understand how Savile was at once protected and by dark forces and feared by the establishment. Now, Rantzen's childline must have uncovered many paedophiles in high places over the last 20 years but I'm not aware of any revelations. Could this mean that she has also been playing the role of informer to the Israelis?
(Esther Rantzen founded Childline in 1986. Childline is now part of the charity NSPCC. aangirfan.blogspot.com)
http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/search?updated-min=2012-01-01T00:00:00%2B01:00&updated-max=2013-01-01T00:00:00%2B01:00&max-results=50
Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’
October 22, 201221st Century Wire
The Jimmy Savile paedophile ring at the centre of the BBC has taken an interesting twist this week as this journalist has come to realise that accusations of child abuse and paedophilia only extend to the deceased.
If you’re a living, breathing human being in the entertainment industry mainstream media won’t expose you. If you are a paedophile or child abuser in the entertainment industry and are famous or powerful you can breath a sigh of relief – you won’t be exposed, at least not by the Murdoch empire.
Jack Malvern a tall, balding ex-public school boy complete with the uniform of his generation was late to the meeting. When he did eventually arrive he had to go shopping for a new pad! When he did eventually arrive proper, he sat down in front of me at the Novotel in Greenwich and asked me specifically to name names of people who, I alleged, were suspected paedophiles or had abused me in some way while I was a minor.
For the next two hours I sat in the Novotel being interviewed intensely and having only one cup of tea. The deal was that I was happy to name alleged paedophiles and child abusers in the wider industry, based on my own experiences but the story had to run.
What was good about the article, I thought, was that The Times were going to be brave and publish the names of actual living breathing people, rather than dead people like Jimmy Savile or Wilfred Brambell. Famous and powerful people who could argue back, perhaps call me a liar or fantasist in an attempt to clear their name.
I talked about *******(Name redacted at the request of Cabinet Office) in political lobbyist Ian Greer’s office. How he gave me alcohol in an attempt to get me drunk. I explained to Jack Malvern that there was even video evidence of the incident as we’d filmed it during our “cash for questions” sting operation for The Cook Report, we had a camera in a briefcase which captured the sordid event.
I talked about a senior female BBC producer who likes to have sex with teenagers. Or I should say have sex with me when I was a teenager. I continued with a long list of names of extremely well known actors, casting directors, producers, directors, writers and executives who had all abused me or attempted to abuse me sexually while I was a child actor.
I explained to Jack Malvern of The Times, that I only ever had sexual relations with women however that didn’t stop predatory gay men from attempting to get into my pants. As a child actor you are not responsible for your actions, you’re naïve, vulnerable and quite frankly an idiot, well I was. So, saying no when powerful industry people are telling you to take drugs with the implication that if you don’t – you won’t be hanging around for long, is highly unlikely. It’s one of the oldest tricks in the book and works really on children, now add sex, money and power into the mix and you’re lucky if you don’t spend life after being a child actor in rehab and therapy – of course some do.
So, from the age of 15 I was a regular at Stringfellows, Cafe De Paris and The Atlantic Bar and Grill. I attended many celebrities parties and private functions.
One party was in a house in the New Forest and I must have been around sixteen at the time. At the party was a certain founder of a child protection charity. I was given drugs, alcohol and was propositioned by men and women all night until I ended up passed out in the garden. I eventually got a cab back to my digs in a terrible state. You’d think that for someone who is known for their charitable works protecting children she might insist that this party was for adults only and make me go home or at least keep an eye on me and stop me from drinking – recognising the fact that I looked and was very young.
For consenting adults there is nothing wrong with sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. However, I was a teenager and was being introduced to a very murky world by so called “respectable” industry figures and celebrities.
Now, none of my story seemed to be a problem for Jack Malvern when he interviewed me, he was happy to publish what I said. After the interview I even checked to see if he was happy with what I said. The only issue was that later in the day he wanted to interview my mother about an incident when I was called into a casting for a major drinks company. I gave him my mother’s telephone number, he left two messages which she ignored as she didn’t want to talk to him. My mother never agreed to talk to Jack Malvern which is what I told him when I later informed him that she didn’t want to be interviewed as she’s a very private person and it was her choice. Jack Malvern didn’t seem to think it was an issue and left me with the impression that the article would run as planned on Saturday 20th October 2012.
Of course printed here are just a few stories of the many that I told him. He’d asked for names and I’d given them to him with details only one who was there would know. He even emphathised at one point and told me that my story rang true for him as he’d experienced similar problems with predatory gay men when he was a young journalist or so he told me.
Little did I know that the next BBC person I named was the one that would stop the article from coming out. The person who I am referring to shall remain nameless in this article, however they are a new star of SKY Television. It seems that Sky have a lot invested in this person and like the BBC stopping the Jimmy Savile Newsnight programme Murdoch et al. have withdrawn an explosive article in The Times that threatened to reveal a far seedier side of their new star than they would like. Drug taking, inappropriate sexual behaviour and child abuse isn’t something the Murdoch empire want revealed.
Now, Jack Malvern of The Times may say that I’m an unreliable person or that they couldn’t corroborate the accusations I was making. But isn’t that what child abuse is all about? There are laws preventing people from making false allegations so why would I lie. In any case they said they’d run the article either with or without the names. So, why didn’t it run? My theory is that they didn’t want to give me the platform of appearing in The Times, just in case I mentioned names at a later date.
The Murdoch empire and BBC are clearly safe havens for child abusers to operate.
A society that takes the position of not believing victims, hiding the truth and protecting abusers for their own personal gain is a sad state of affairs. It is typical of a society gone mad, set up to procure children and to protect paedophiles. In other words children’s well-being comes down to simply politics. If you accuse someone of abuse and they happen to be famous or powerful then tough luck you lose. You won’t be believed, regardless of the validity of your claims by either the state or mainstream corporate media seems to be the message.
The irony is that the Murdoch empire, who has always been quick to name and shame is curiously reluctant when it comes to naming one of its own stars. It appears that the empire is only prepared to expose child abusers and paedophiles as long as it doesn’t affect its own reputation.
We’ve moved on from just phone hacking.
One of News International’s slogans on their Website is “We’re delivering more news, to more people, more often, in more ways than ever”. If the Murdoch press is willing to deny the public vital information which is in their interest to know, like exposing paedophiles and child abusers, then the question has to be – Are News International’s titles worth the paper they’re written on? Or more importantly, are the Murdochs responsible enough to run a media empire influencing millions of people all around the world.
If they’re hiding child abuse, then the answer is no.
Listen to The Ben Fellows Radio Show atwww.thebenfellowsradioshow.com.
…
RELATED: BEN FELLOWS SAYS ‘THEY ASKED ME TO NAME NAMES, BUT DIDN’T LIKE THE ONES I GAVE!’
RELATED: ‘I RAN THE GAUNTLET OF PEDOPHILES IN THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY’
RELATED: ‘HE’LL FIX IT!’ SIR JIMMY WAS A CHILD ‘FIXER’ FOR THE ELITE
Sent in by David Turnbull
Dear Tap,
I am pretty sure i watched a video clip some time ago as in maybe 2 years when Esther Rantzen was stopped in the street by Robert Green acting on behalf of Hollie Greig and she was given a brief rundown of the case by Robert and tho' it was obvious she did know something she chose to walk on and ignore him. I can't locate the video but if any of your readers can it would certainly put beyond any doubt the hypocritical nature of this limelight hugging wannabe shedding crocodile tears about her feigned horror at the saville disclosures.
Letter to Esther Rantzen written by Peter Eyre
9 comments:
stirling work peter may i thank you on behalf of us all
T Stokes London
peter eyre?
saw the green rantzen video myself
it wouldn't surpise me if she's totally involved in paedophilia herself
remember the 2009 report on how the top elite at nspcc were creaming millions for themselves & shutting down help lines because they didn't have enough cash to run them?
Until UK Column et al 'come clean' about what is developing into a 'hollyhoax' - this Holly Greig business should be dropped! There are too many questions unanswered into Robert Green's background and unlawful activities and misrepresentation of this case. It could be set up to completely undermine investigation and reporting on genuine and serious child abuse. Rantzen is just another Jew doing what she and her ilk do and have done for thousands of years; ignoring the Hollie Greig affair is not a viable hook on which to hang any case!
What evidence do you have for calling Holly Greig's evidence a hoax?
If we accept that the Rothschild banking dynasty is at the top of the pyramid in this country and that Savile was a 'fixer' between politicians and children from children's homes, and that he was passing on info to the Israelis about said politicians to be used by them as blackmail, we can understand how Savile was at once protected and by dark forces and feared by the establishment. Now, Rantzen's childline must have uncovered many paedophiles in high places over the last 20 years but I'm not aware of any revelations. Could this mean that she has also been playing the role of informer to the Israelis?
Im a zionist Jew.
would you like to accuse me of these disgusting things?
I also am a cohen & rothschild. So lets see you take me to court You sick pervert.
for the record, why have you not posted any blogs about the Muslim pakistani peodophile grooming ring in the North of England, in your pages?
Afraid of a fatwa?
Along with Dick Icke, who never mentioned it also.
Hypocrite. If you had a pair of bollocks you would have covered THAT conspiracy also.
I get stuff sent in about Moslem paedophile operations, but they don't connect into the higher echelons of power like the Savile revelations, which go all the way to the top of politics, media, finance and Royalty. The Moslem rings are also well covered in the media, while these are covered up by the media. I am also (part) Jewish on my mother's side. Zionist is the problem.
"I am sure that the ever growing “Hollies Army” are all fired up and ready to go into battle……for the Scots over the border…remember “Brave Heart” and don’t let this scum tarnish the good name of Scotland. Bless you all."
Of course when the martyr's wounds are healed and all the misplaced piety evaporates we are once again left with a spineless English pig doing what spineless English pigs always do best - sucking up to those bleeding the country dry. Remember 'Braveheart'? Why not remember why that filthy extravaganza got made in the first place? Do the English believe they will be liked for ingratiating themselves, or hated a bit less, or is it just that they are too vain and shallow to give a shit about their own kind anyway? ‘Probably’ is the answer. The English took to christianity like a duck to water precisely because it made a virtue of impulses most normal people feel ashamed of. You seem to think what matters is to treat behaviour of this kind in a way that transcends borders because, like stupid fucking English people everywhere, you prefer to believe in 'britishness' and shared purposes, because you think flattering parasites who only care to advance their own interests will somehow help your own. Proclaiming scottish nationhood ['scotland's good name'] in a way you'd never do on England's behalf [you prefer the anonymity of 'ukay' where we're concerned naturally] implies a capacity for self-abasement that detracts from any loftier motive you might have for running a website of this nature. Effectively you tread the time-worn path of idealizing a way of life predicated on destroying your own. Certainly you seem happy enough to ignore the many 'proud scots' who work successfully to protect their country from the mass immigration that in government they use to avenge themselves on England. It all rather shows how little you care about anyone but yourself in point of fact, a kneeling position of craven apostasy on the one subject of your people's right to exist that renders you untrustworthy on every other. I despise you